I take a considerable about of caffeine through the ingestion of coffee. To make this activity more pleasant, I garnish it with a impeccable set of cup and spoon. The spoon is quite special to me because I honestly never seen one similar to it; probably due to my disregard to kitchen objects. It…
“I couldn’t work for another newspaper. I can only work for a paper where I can write objectively. I can’t write that in the last 20 years, it’s all been so wonderful in our country because I know it’s not true. Saying everything’s just great. Kissing officials’ backsides. I won’t do that, not so I can earn $500 or $600 a month. I’d rather earn less but tell the truth.”—
Journalist Zhanara Kasymbekova in The Fight to Publish, a film about Kazakhstan’s only mass-produced opposition paper.
After Kazakhstan gained independence from the Soviet Union in 1991, a system of double standards was created. To the outside world, the language of democracy is used to attract foreign investors. On the inside, journalists must navigate the dangerous realities of imprisonment, fines, interrogations by secret police, and raids of editorial offices. In two decades of independence, not a single murdered journalist’s case has been solved. Ostrovsky’s film follows journalist Zhanara, Staff reporter as the Golos Respubliki newspaper, as she covers stories from her base in Almaty - and when breaking news of the riots in Zhanaozen takes her to the aftermath of the bloodiest day in Kazakhstan’s modern history.
The Respublika newspaper did not come out of this frightening period unscathed. The editorial staff were threatened when the beheaded corpse of a dog was hung outside the newspaper’s window. It turned out that this was only a prelude to the arson of our editorial office, which was burned to the ground. At the same time, our editor-in-chief, Irina Petrushova, was charged with tax evasion and forced to flee the country. By 2009, the newspaper had been forced to shut down by one of its creditors, the government-controlled BTA bank. But despite all the pressure, the newspaper reopened under the new name it uses today: Golos Respubliki.
FJP: A wake-up call to the realities faced by journalists around the world. Zhanara has to fight to cover news objectively, risking her life in the process.
“The reality is that there have never been as few wars as there are today. Humankind has never been as healthy or as wealthy. Our contemporary techno-media wonderland means that whenever a disaster occurs, almost anywhere in the world, we know about it within hours. Only recently, we heard about a cruise ship sinking off the coast of Italy, a shooting incident in Belgium, and a bushfire in Western Australia. Our brains are not really wired to accommodate such a proliferation of bad news, regardless of it happening thousands of miles away. One disaster after another compounds, and increases feelings of helplessness. Does that mean that on some level we’ve lost our way? Absolutely not. But what it does mean is that we need to realize that with the ever-increasing media outlets, we must be vigilant in maintaining our own personal view of happiness.”—Martin Lindstrom in his recent Fast Company article, How To Be Happy Anywhere
With these words, NPR commits itself as an organization to avoid the worst excesses of “he said, she said” journalism. It says to itself that a report characterized by false balance is a false report. It introduces a new and potentially powerful concept of fairness: being “fair to the truth,” which as we know is not always evenly distributed among the sides in a public dispute.
Maintaining the “appearance of balance” isn’t good enough, NPR says. “If the balance of evidence in a matter of controversy weighs heavily on one side…” we have to say so. When we are spun, we don’t just report it. “We tell our audience…” This is spin!
Last weekend I presented a paper at the 8th Annual Soka Education Conference held at my alma mater, Soka University of America. You can learn about the conference here. I discussed news literacy & Soka Education, an educational framework developed by the late Japanese educator, Tsunesaburo Makiguchi. You can poke around the conference site to learn more.
You can e-mail me for the actual paper (entitled From George Orwell to Media Literacy: Soka Education for Informed Media Consumers), but here is the presentation version & prezi. Happy reading!
*Note: conversations are fictionalized, quotes are real but based on writings, not meetings.
A Man Named George.
I have been 22 years old for a very long time. The events that allow me to perpetually own this age begin on a rainy British afternoon in 1946, when I had tea with a man named George. You might also know him as Orwell. He was a writer, journalist, and generally brilliant man who loved rules and always had some to offer. In fact, that evening, he spent a good ten minutes lecturing me on how to take my tea.
It was my fault really. I tried to put sugar in it.
“How can you call yourself a true tealover,” he said, “if you destroy the flavour of your tea by putting sugar in it? It would be equally reasonable to put in pepper or salt. Tea is meant to be bitter, just as beer is meant to be bitter.”
A few days after this he had an article published in the Evening Standard on how to make a nice cup of tea.
That said, you can image how strict he might be about writing.
George and I had a long discussion on language. “Political speech and writing,” he told me “are largely the defense of the indefensible.”
I didn’t understand.
He explained, “Things like the continuance of British rule in India, the Russian purges and deportations, the dropping of the atom bombs on Japan…can be defended only by arguments which are too brutal for most people to face.”
“Thus,” he went on, “political language has to consist largely of euphemism, question-begging and sheer cloudy vagueness…it is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable.”
I was dumbfounded. “But why, George?” I asked, “How do you mean?”
He gave me some examples.
“Defenceless villages are bombarded from the air, the inhabitants driven out into the countryside, the cattle machine-gunned, the huts set on fire with incendiary bullets,” he said.
“This is called pacification.”
“Millions of peasants are robbed of their farms and sent trudging along the roads with no more than they can carry,” he said.
My heart felt heavy.
“This is called rectification of frontiers.”
“People are imprisoned for years without trial, or shot in the back of the neck, or sent to die of scurvy in Arctic lumber camps,” he said.
I choked back my tea, and tears.
“This is called elimination of unreliable elements.”
"But George, this is terrible!" I cried.
“Such phraseology is needed,” he explained, “if one wants to name things without calling up mental pictures of them.”
George Orwell explained to me that sure, language reflects existing social values. But changing how we choose to use language, how we construct our sentences, can also slow the decay of social conditions, and maybe even reverse it.
He then, of course, went on to prescribe a set of rules for the English language. It was all later recorded into a wonderful essay, called Politics & the English Language. You might like to read it sometime.
In 1950 George passed away. What he left me with was a large, growing sense of curiosity about the impact of language, embedded with small, stubborn bits of hope on how we might use it best.
Since then, I’ve remained on the look-out for blindness blindness to the visceral actualities of current affairs and the incomprehensible forms of language that sustain it.
This brings us to today.
I’ve a struggled a bit, to be honest, to contemporize George’s critique of political language.
I spent a few decades thinking I might have it down, walking the streets of New York, preaching his rules to every friend I’d make: Tell it like it is, I’d say. Never use a long word where a short one will do, I’d say. And I’d go home in the evening when the chatter of the day had quieted, I’d put off my television set and and take my tea without sugar and sleep soundly.
Then the 90s hit, and the 2000’s. The chatter of the day suddenly, wouldn’t end. No it would get louder and louder, louder even today, and my TV box would turn on without my doing and my pockets would beep and buzz and it seems every time I answer the phone there’s a headline mixed up with my phonebook telling me about a war across the ocean, a new invention which looks exactly like the one before it, and battles that can be fought through video games. And suddenly it seems oil has turned to magic, as it can make cars run, french fries taste good, men lie, and children die, all at the same time.
Now when I wake up in the morning and go out into the street I’m dizzy and fatigued, and I have more grey hairs, and once in a while I even wish I could just read a nice paper bundle of political lies wrapped up neat and tidy, delivered to my doorstep once a day.
I wish I still knew how to identify blindness and the lies that protect it, but it seems everything is blinding all the time these days.
I wish George and I could have a cup of tea and he could give me another list of rules to preach. But he can’t.
So I’ve switched to coffee now, and I’ve met with some nice people who love George as much as I do, and we’ve concluded that it really is grim out there, and cloudy.
George was, right, wasn’t he? It is easier to turn a blind eye, to embrace powerlessness, and to condemn politics than it is to accept what drives war, greed, scandal, injustice and violence. Be it through political language, or digital swimming pools, sometimes it’s nice to not know because when you don’t know, you don’t have to care.
So, I’ve finally contemporized George’s critique. Here’s my go at it:
The ambiguous political rhetoric of 1946 allowed decision-makers and ordinary citizens to live with their conscience intact, despite deteriorating political and social values. Orwell exposed a sort of convenient “illiteracy” of the time.
In 2012, we too suffer from an inundation by language, though it’s not just political. Let’s call it media illiteracy: a reduced state of consciousness due to the overwhelming amounts of information & reporting (relevant or not) that we consume.
Luckily, George embedded my awareness with hope, and I think this is where we make a new set of rules.
I began thinking, and watching, and reading and meeting news consumers, feeling the weight of an unperceived illiteracy alive still today and yet unnameable. And then through the beeping and buzzing and primetime fussing about presidential incapabilities I penned it down.
What leads to this new illiteracy, this news illiteracy?
1. News we don’t realize we consume through billboards and graphics and headlines and broadcasts, on every street corner, multiplying at the same rate my heart beats, faster still, when i try to run from it.
2. Networked cable news, partisan, profit-powered, 85% male, 92% white, and did you know that just this month, 62% percent of guests invited to comment on contraception, were men?
3. Trusting sources. Hyperlocal blogs, indie publications, citizen journalists comprise this new networked public sphere, but are their agendas, facts verifiable?, business models sustainable?
The list does go on and it went on in my head and on paper, until another rainy afternoon, in 2011, when I had coffee with a man named Dean.
He works at Stony Brook University’s Center for News Literacy.
He became my new George in a way, and we had a long conversation on language, and ways and the why in which we could remedy how we receive it. He is a teacher seeking to alleviate illiteracy through classroom exercises and streetside improvising:
"News Blackout"- don’t consume any news at all for 48 hours
"Different eyes, Different ears"- for 48 hours adopt the news consumption habits of a classmate don’t judge them.
We discussed tools, tips, trades and trends, alternative digests, curated by thinking minds with lots of time so you could collect the best from the rest. We discussed how to check facts like a journalist and news diets and how to trim intellectual belly fat and Facebook and Tumblr and Twitter Feedly and Fuego, subscriptions to social reading and finding facts without meaning.
“News literacy,” Dean told me, demonstrates a method of active and reasoned examination of received truths and wisdom that is missing in much of undergraduate education.”
Consider this, he told me. “In one class, students watch a Jon Stewart critique of a Fox News story that uses sexually charged clips of bikini-clad students on spring break as the eyewash for a story on a serial prostitute killer running loose in Daytona Beach.”
“By questioning the connection between dead prostitutes (the spoken narrative) and partying spring breakers (the visual narrative), they learn the difference between truth grounded in fact and Colbertian ‘truthiness’ grounded in the artifice and fabrication of news coverage.”
We went through many exercises that day, about wikileaks cables and what it might feel like to be a diplomat in the country from which a cable was leaked. About challenging American minds on what they believe, to learn what we don’t know.
I thanked Dean that evening and went about my night, thinking, what other components might there be to our distaste for that which is different or uncomfortable? And the very next morning I had a chat with a man named Ted (Koppel) who gently and smilingly reminded me,
“We now feel entitled not to have the news that we need but the news that we want. We want to listen to news that comes from those who already sympathize with our particular point of view. We don’t want facts anymore.”
I remembered George for a moment, and the convenience of ambiguous language. Then I thought, where else might I take my questions?
That brings us to this very moment, and everything we have discussed in these last 48 hours about studying and living and learning as complete human beings, who perceive their interconnectedness, and do not deny difference, but cultivate compassion and imaginative empathy for those suffering in distant places.
You can imagine what comes next.
Time traveling and tea, with Makiguchi, who gave me a good bit of advice.
“Let us consider,” he said, “the possibility of establishing a science of evaluation to provide us with the standards by which to weigh and set values, just as the conceptual framework of logic already offers us rules by which to recognize truth.”
Evaluation! I jumped. The parts of my brain in which I held onto my conversations with George and Dean burst into light and color.
Makiguchi went on. “The cognition of truth is a yes-no proposition: This is true, and that is false, with no middle ground for passing judgment.”
“On the other hand, the determination of value is entirely relative: This seems appropriate, and that inappropriate.”
I thought of the bikini-clad spring breakers.
“Feelings are the province of evaluating how we as subjects of our own emotional universe interact with things,” he explained.
I thought about it.
The fact is, in consuming news, we do evaluate information as subjects of our own emotional universe.
That’s why it’s difficult to accept particular viewpoints And that’s how we decide what news to watch, from where, in what quantity, on what device.
“I look at the world today,” said Makiguchi, “and find nothing so insidious as this confusion between truth and value, cognition and evaluation. Mixing the two constricts actual understanding and prevents people from assuming an attitude of clarity and responsibility toward their chosen positions.”
My mind wandered to a youtube video I’d seen not too long ago of Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi’s death. It was gruesome yet I’d barely blinked at it.
What allowed me to ignore moral discomfort at publicly viewing his death? Someone else’s value I’d accepted that he was a bad man and deserved it?
Makiguchi seemd to peer into my head. “There are people who side with someone solely on the basis of reputation,” he said, “without actually seeing or listening or getting to know that person for themselves.”
“Oh I see this all the time,” I replied.
“This can prove to be the source of numerous social weaknesses. Citizens who will not even give an opening to understanding unless they already favor a particular view will mindlessly believe every word uttered by some respected figure, whether what that person says is true or not.”
Suddenly, it clicked.
I ignored moral discomfort on a daily basis when viewing the news. Mainly because I knew I was powerless, and apathy was somewhat of an expert coping strategy.
The Orwell in my mind, smiled at that moment, I’m sure of it.
I thought of Dean’s news literacy classroom and exercises, of the networked public sphere, of media nutrition and trimming belly fat and realized, perhaps, news consumption could actually be supplemented by a exercise regimen in which i could practice distinguishing between cognition and evaluation on a daily basis, fill my plate up with conflicting opinions identify my biases and not only trim belly fat but gain a little bit of moral endurance.
Perhaps Soka Education could offer to news literacy the very thing that it struggled to address: critical thinking exercises that helped readers identify their biases and place their own judgment on fact.
When you gain something new, how does it relate to what you already know, feel, believe?
Consuming news, I thought, held the very unique space for adults to actually be life-long learners.
I thanked Makiguchi, walked myself home and stopped at a bookshop to purchase a notebook and pen.
My phone beeped and buzzed but I ignored it for the moment to make a list of rules for the consumption of language.
I’m not entirely sure what they will be but I am sure this is where we’ll have to work together I can make you an expert cup of tea (or coffee) on a rainy afternoon. So I hope the conversations will continue.
“Washington correspondents from newspapers around the country were as unabashedly partisan during the 1800’s as the Washington newspapers themselves. As Bernard A.Weisberger points out in his book Reporters for the Union, a journalist might describe one senator as having “a fawning, sinister smile; a keen, snaky eye; . . .his whole air and mien suggesting a subdued combination of Judas Iscariot with Uriah Heep.” The speech of a senator who shared the reporter’s partisan views, however, was “full of marrow and grit, and enunciated with a courage which did one’s heart good to hear.” No one complained about biased coverage because no one expected anything different.
Partisan journalism survived as the dominant approach to covering political news until the end of the 19th century. But around that time, two forces, both related to the rise of a national economy, began to militate for change in the ethic of partisan journalism. First, a large class of readers developed who were educated and interested in receiving accounts of political news that did not try to make up their minds for them. Second, wire services such as the Associated Press—which, as the telegraph spread, were serving more and more newspapers in every part of the country—decided that partisanship was bad business. In the course of pleasing one party’s newspapers, the wire services would displease not only the other party’s, but also all of those readers who wanted their news unleavened with overt political bias.”—
The Economist: Self-ascribed as “the most trusted source of global news analysis,” The Economist has been delivering noteworthy news pieces since 1843. This Tumblr page aggregates thought-provoking quotes, the week’s cartoon, and curated long-form pieces from the Economist website and the magazine.
Short Form Blog:Short Form’s motto is: “Read a little. Learn a lot.” This Tumblr is perfect for news junkies on the go. It delivers important news in bite-size nuggets, so you don’t waste anytime reading fluff while trying to keep up with the latest news. Pull quotes and succinct summaries make this Tumblr a must for news advocates who are short on time.
Brooklyn Mutt:Peter Wade of The Daily runs this catch-all Tumblr blog. The site is primarily concerned with rounding up the latest news—from breaking stories and international headlines, to movie releases, viral memes, celebrity tweets, and more.
Neigborhoodr: Sometimes quality local news is tough to find. The Neighborhoodr Tumblr blogs are looking to change that with their hyper-localized network of news blogs. Just choose your city from the list and read up on local issues. It’s a great way to stay informed of neighborhood initiatives, events, and more.
Journal of a Journalist:For true news-philes, this blog by Neil Ungerleider of Fast Company, provides interesting insight into the world of journalism. You’ll find interesting news stories, invaluable commentary, and an awesome sci-fi slant. A great place to find news you didn’t even know you cared about.
GOOD: GOOD is a great place to stay informed on all things humming in the philanthropic world. Whether it’s the latest efforts to reform education, new findings on gender disparity in the media world, or a think piece on organic wine, you can get all of your humanitarian-focused news here.
Future Journalism Project: The Future Journalism Project “explores disruption, opportunity, and innovation in journalism” and it sure does deliver. You’ll find tons of news pieces relating to the current state of journalism—and tons more on what’s soon to come. Whether you’re looking for insight into Patch, Pinterest, or issues affecting journalism, you’re likely to find what you’re looking for on the Future Journalism Project. It’s a great way to stay up-to-date on issues affecting the news industry.
Breaking News: CNN’s Breaking News has an extremely active Twitter account, Facebook page, and website. So it should come as little surprise that their Tumblr page is yet another great medium to get the latest in breaking news. This clean, streamlined blog shows headline-worthy photos and posts important news from around the globe.
The Atlantic: The Atlantic’s Tumblr blog is a perfect antidote to offset the anxious lulls between the magazine’s released issues. It showcases gorgeous photos, provocative quotes, and interesting memes found across the web. It’s a great way to keep up with the publication while you eagerly await the next full issue.
Mother Jones: Get your MoJo fix in a whole new way, with the Mother Jones Tumblr page. The site features a range of intriguing news bits—from pressing current issues, economic op-eds, and political insights, to viral memes and witty pictures. Plus, if you feel so inclined, you can ask a MoJo editor anything you want using Tumblr’s Q&A feature.
At the end of January, the European Commission released its official data protection rules, including a new directive, “the right to be forgotten,” which adheres to European law that protects information privacy, such as France’s le droit à l’oubli, sometimes translated at the right of…
“Personality is composed of two fundamentally different types of traits: those of ‘character;’ and those of ‘temperament.’ Your character traits stem from your experiences. Your childhood games; your family’s interests and values; how people in your community express love and hate; what relatives and friends regard as courteous or perilous… innumerable cultural forces build your unique set of character traits. The balance of your personality is your temperament, all the biologically based tendencies that contribute to your consistent patterns of feeling, thinking and behaving. As Spanish philosopher, Jose Ortega y Gasset, put it, ‘I am, plus my circumstances.’ Temperament is the ‘I am,’ the foundation of who you are.”—Biological anthropologist Helen Fisher in This Will Make You Smarter, a fantastic collection of short essays by 151 big thinkers, who each answered the question, “What scientific concept will improve everybody’s cognitive toolkit?”
By Carlos H. Conde, NY Times, May 16, 2011 MANILA—When a panel of executives from the Philippines’ top broadcasting networks defended their industry last September before legislators examining the news media’s conduct during a botched hostage rescue, the fact that four of the five executives…
“Journalism is a manifestation of a basic human urge to know and to communicate our knowledge to others. Such an essential impulse is impossible to fully repress.”—
Joel Simon in the Committee to Protect Journalists’ Annual Report. Via The Atlantic
CPJ’s findings reflect a profound shift toward reliance on Internet advocacy. “Blogging, video sharing and text messaging from cellphones now bring news from some of the most oppressive countries to the rest of the world,” the annual survey concludes, “Yet the technology used to report the news has been matched in many ways by the tools used to suppress information.” In Syria, for example, CPJ says, there is a practice that computer experts call “rubber-hose cryptanalysis,” which means, bluntly, the use of force to extract critical data from activists, including passwords and log-in details. As 2012 unfolds, the likelihood is that the governments and regimes where civil strife continues will keep up the pressure on journalists, and social media will defy the attempts to suppress it.
“As journalism and the habit of reading decline, it seems entirely possible that political intelligence will develop into a billion-dollar industry. People will still need information about government affairs, after all. But this information may become a luxury commodity for the very rich rather than something ordinary citizens consume by reading newspapers and magazines or listening to the radio or watching the evening news. Demand for all these mediums has dwindled, and the rise of the Internet doesn’t appear to have taken up the slack. Politicians, meanwhile, who after all have limited time on their hands, may increasingly wonder why they should spend any of it talking to a mere reporter when they can talk instead to a political intelligence consultant who just might reward the favor with a fat campaign contribution.”—
The News: The US House of Representatives killed a provision in an insider trading bill that would have required people involved in ‘political intelligence’ to register in the same way that traditional lobbyists do.
Political intelligence is a $300 million a year industry used by hedge funds and mutual funds to get information about which way politicians are going to vote — or what legislation will be enacted — that effect industries that they are invested in.
Information obesity, that is. Clay Johnson sums it up quite well in this LA Times piece.
The problem is that these days you can feast on information as never before, and you can do it without leaving the living room couch. But consuming too much of the wrong kind of information can lead to…
“His photographs from those days and nights in 2008 — and many more taken as a citizen tagging along with officers in 2009, after he resigned from the force to pursue photography full time — offer a unique and fascinating glimpse into the world of the housing police. They are at turns raw and tender, scary and sweet, and they humanize people on both sides of the badge — those who wear one and those who face them, night after night.”—The cop who takes photos. So moving. Read/View at the NY Times Lens Blog. Looks like citizen journalism to me.
“A nation’s journalists and writers, like its poets and story-tellers, are the eyes, ears, and mouths of the people. When journalists cannot freely speak of what they see and hear of the reality that surrounds them, the people cannot see, hear, or speak it either.”—
Russell Banks, American Author, to colleagues during a PEN International mission to Mexico that is encouraging law enforcement to better protect journalists.
The Most Important Point (for me) out of Obama's #SOTU speech tonight.
1. Obama’s about to get a lot of shit for his lofty laundry list that had most of the liberals on my feed happily tweeting quotes from the full transcript. I hate to fall to cynicism but this was all a bit too campaign-y for me. How much can be actualized? Seems like he’s in ‘get the middle-class / young voters excited again’ mode.
2. So I’ll just pick my favorite (yet untweeted) quote from tonight:
They know that this generation’s success is only possible because past generations felt a responsibility to each other, and to their country’s future, and they know our way of life will only endure if we feel that same sense of shared responsibility. That’s how we’ll reduce our deficit. That’s an America built to last.
The problem is, we’re lacking that sense of shared responsibility. Does anyone really care about the next generation? About people across class lines? Doesn’t seem like it.
What distinguishes first-class individuals from others? In my view, it is essentially the fact that they focus their gaze on posterity and base their thoughts and action on the welfare of future generations. Those who do so have a vision. They are not swayed by short-term phenomena of the present.
So, do I give in to cynicism, or do I take Obama and Ikeda’s common point of great truth and try to live it out in my own life? What’s your vision for future generations? I dare you to believe in it…and if you’re young, like me, build a career with faith in the long road ahead.
In both cases, the children have grown up not knowing that their biological fathers – whom they have not seen in decades – were police officers who had adopted fake identities to infiltrate activist groups. Both men have concealed their true identities from the children’s mothers for many years.
This makes the phone-hacking scandal look like a beacon of ethical behavior. Wow.
“It was the power of American technology that helped drive the revolts — Google, Facebook and Twitter — and shared American values that shaped the demands of the demonstrators. Now, the question of American interests will be determined, in part, by a new Middle East that is likely to be more democratic, more Islamist and perhaps more volatile than ever.”
What are American interests? “American” technology helped drive the revolts. “American” values shaped the demands. But are American political and national security interests in the region really the same as the values and motives of the creators of Facebook and Twitter and Google? Are they the same Americans? I think it’s unfair to use “American” as a blanket term here, or ever, and yet we do it all the time.
“A rare moment of clarity came from Keith Kelly of the NY Post, who reminded his peers that despite their “high and mighty and noble” misconceptions, newspapers were created to sell ads, not serve the public. In true Murdochian style he urged everyone to remember that print “was an ad-driven vehicle at its inception…it was a vehicle for commerce.”—
Wow. 2,000? There are only about 19,000 named places in the US. Right now, API’s added in 2000 is greater than the number of daily newspapers by about 50%. At what point do APIs start to make a significant impact in how we consume news, or access civic information? Actually, they’re undoubtedly already significant — but when does the balance shift?
“With the new year here, everyone’s starting to set new resolutions. I really hope that one resolution that starts becoming more popular is individuals wanting to learn to program. You should learn to program, and now. Why? You interact with software on a daily basis. Software that will frustrate, annoy, help and/or let you get what you need done. If you understand what’s possible with software, you can understand why it works the way it does.
* Small programs can replace repetitive, boring manual tasks that you do on a daily basis.
* We need more programmers. Software development is a high demand field, especially for web programmers.
* It’s easier than ever to learn to program. There are a ton of free/cheap online resources.
Learning to program changes the way you think and approach solving problems.
So what are you waiting for? Go sign up at codeyear or codeacademy or tryruby or Khan Academy. I even teach ruby lessons as well if you want one on one help and instruction.”—
The International Journal of Communication has a new study that explores “information flow” during the Arab Spring. In particular, it looks at how Twitter promulgated information from Tunisia and Egypt to and among journalists, activists, mainstream media outlets and other interested parties.
The evolution of what media theorist Jeff Jarvis and others have called “networked journalism” has made the business of news much more chaotic, since it now consists of thousands of voices instead of just a few prominent ones who happen to have the tools to make themselves heard. If there is a growth area in media, it is in the field of “curated news,” where real-time filters like NPR’s Andy Carvin or the BBC’s user-generated-content desk verify and re-distribute the news that comes in from tens of thousands of sources, and use tools like Storify to present a coherent picture of what is happening on the ground.
The study makes the point that mainstream media outlets play a key role in the dissemination of news during such events (and also notes that journalists tend to retweet other journalists more often than they do non-mainstream sources), but it also makes it obvious that prominent bloggers and activists are crucial information conduits as well.
Humanistic Journalism exists! This is the best thing I’ve seen online in a long time, and kind of a dream come true for the online future I’m so sure we can build: An incredible new story-telling tool, Cowbird calls itself a public library of human experience, and it really is. It combines the best social media tools out there into clean, beautiful design to create a new, human, crowd-sourced community.
What can you do?
Document “sagas,” that is, big events going on the world, through collaborative journalism.
Contribute to a public library of simple human stories.
It was developed by a fantastic team including Jonathan Harris. He writes: “We are focused on a slower kind of storytelling than the frantic world of tweets and social networks. We use these tools (they are part of our consciousness now) but we also feel a craving for a longer-lasting kind of self-expression, so we have designed a space for self-reflection and deeper connection — a place for personal stories. Stories allow us to untangle experience, make sense of our lives, and find meaning. They are containers for wisdom and lifeboats for memory — helping us not to forget, and then later, not to be forgotten.”
And why is it called Cowbird? Best explanation ever: “We chose the name Cowbird to express the combined qualities of a cow and a bird. Cows are slow, steady, and grounded, while birds are fast, free, and full of joy. Most of the Internet — including websites like Facebook and Twitter — are all bird and no cow, while more traditional formats like novels and operas are all cow and no bird. Cowbird combines these two extremes to form a new kind of storytelling medium — mixing the slow, deeply rooted, contemplative idea of a cow with the fast, efficient, playful idea of a bird.”
You need an invite to sign up, which you can get by submitting a mini-application.
The Republican Governor’s Association met this week in Florida to give GOP state executives a chance to rejuvenate, strategize and team-build. But during a plenary session on Wednesday, one question kept coming up: How can Republicans do a better job of talking about Occupy Wall Street?
1. Don’t say ‘capitalism.’
2. Don’t say that the government ‘taxes the rich.’ Instead, tell them that the government ‘takes from the rich.’
3. Republicans should forget about winning the battle over the ‘middle class.’ Call them ‘hardworking taxpayers.
4. Don’t talk about ‘jobs.’ Talk about ‘careers.’
5. Don’t say ‘government spending.’ Call it ‘waste.’
6. Don’t ever say you’re willing to ‘compromise.’
7. The three most important words you can say to an Occupier: ‘I get it.’
8. Out: ‘Entrepreneur.’ In: ‘Job creator.’
9. Don’t ever ask anyone you want them to ‘sacrifice.’
10. Always blame Washington.
Please click over to Yahoo! to read this article. And throughout the course of the year, I suggest revisiting it to see how Republicans follow through. Great lesson in messaging.
“I think aid is all worthless. It doesn’t do any good to most of the people. You end up taking money from poor people in this country and it goes to rich people in other countries, gets used for weapons of war… the biggest threat to our country is our financial situation, and this is aggravating it.” — Ron Paul, answering a question initially posed to Herman Cain: whether he felt we could afford to continue foreign aid to Africa for things like AIDS, malaria, and the like. Worth noting: foreign aid presently makes up about 1% of the U.S. federal budget.
Ron Paul was talking about the US financial situation with respect to both (paraphrase) endless military spending and endless foreign aid... you are misquoting and misrepresenting what he said, so that it appears as if he was talking solely about foreign aid.
Point well taken on the military spending, Paul did indeed reference rampant war spending in the same passage, and we should have noted that as it’s quite relevant to his final point on financial stability. That said, we assure you we’re not aiming to misrepresent Ron Paul’s views. Since the question he was responding to (initially asked to Herman Cain) was explicitly about the U.S. foreign aid budget, and he voiced what we’d consider a fairly extreme view on that subject, we focused on that and cropped the non-aid related section. It can be hard to keep up with posting as the debates unfold in real time, and consequently we can have oversights sometime. Thanks for reading, and for being alert!